The Temple House Vanishing, by Rachel Donohue (Algonquin Books)
I requested an ARC of this book based on the description: a
mystery set in a Catholic boarding school. Twenty-five years before the
opening, Louisa, a brilliant but lonely student, and Mr. Lavelle, a charismatic
art teacher, have mysteriously disappeared. Victoria, who knew them both, has
just committed suicide at the school itself. Why did she kill herself? What
happened to Louisa and Mr. Lavelle? Did they elope together? Were they murdered
or did they perish through an accident? Or were the disappearances unrelated? The
atmosphere of an isolated Victorian mansion set on a cliff in Ireland added to
the appeal.
Very early in the book, however, I became increasingly disappointed
and frustrated. By the end, I was ready to throw the book across the room in
disgust, except that I was reading it on my Kindle and I don’t treat my
electronic devices so cavalierly. Based on the description, The
Temple House Vanishing promised me a genre novel – YA, school story,
and mystery, all in one – and yet it consistently violated the conventions of
all three, and not in a skillful way.
The opening point of view, a journalist who happened to live
on the same street as Louisa and who is investigating the disappearance, was
hard to relate to and never made any sense to me. She isn’t involved in the
events, and her own life, irrelevant to the rest of the story, seemed remote
and uninteresting. Then we get into Louisa’s story, narrated by herself.
Therein lies the second hurdle, because Louisa doesn’t sound or act like a
teen, even one who’s stuck in her head. Almost all teens, whether intellectual
“brains” or not, center their lives around the fundamental issues of those
years: independence from parents, confusion about who they are and what they
want to become, desperate need for approval from peers, and so forth. Hormones
saturate their bloodstreams, and the parts of their brains associated with
executive functions, delayed gratification, and long-term planning, won’t
mature until their mid-20s. It doesn’t matter how bright or academically gifted
they are, they are still at the mercy of these internal storms. Louisa’s
first-person narrative reads like the overly elitist pontifications of a writer
with a very poor memory of her own teenaged years, or perhaps one seen through
extremely adult-colored lenses, and with no understanding of the conventions of
the genre. I cannot imagine a teen reader finding Louisa believable or
interesting.
Then we meet Victoria, who becomes the object of Louisa’s
bloodless passion. Both girls exhibit a disconnection between their
intellectual philosophizing and their relationships so extreme as to verge into
psychotic dissociation. I never perceived, through their speech or behavior, or
through the inner voice of the narrative, any shred of genuine emotion until
very near the end, when it became clear that Louisa was just as infatuated with
Victoria as Victoria was with Mr. Lavelle. But for the most part, each
experiences a pale, distant imitation of obsession, not the visceral stuff of
teen suicide pacts or Romeo and Juliet.
Not a hint of lesbian romance, requited or not, could I discern.